Jimmy Song, an independent Bitcoin developer and commentator, wrote in a blog post on Saturday that the Runes frenzy has made it nearly impossible to get a transaction included into certain blocks without paying an exorbitantly high transaction fee.
“The Runes asset issuance has overridden almost every other use case at the moment,” Song wrote.
The Bitcoin Layer substack wrote that Runes appears to be a “game of greater fools in which essentially everybody loses,” but it does take up block space and may “accentuate the need for hastening the development of and further expansion of liquidity on layer-2 scaling solutions like the Lightning Network.”
Transaction fees as a percentage of the total miner revenue per block jumped to their highest level ever of 75%, according to the authors Joe Consorti and Nik Bhatia.
See also: Grayscale’s Planned Mini Bitcoin ETF Will Have a 0.15% Fee, the Lowest Among Spot Bitcoin ETFs
‘Preview of what’s to come’
It’s “a preview of what’s to come in Bitcoin mining economics decades from now, as Bitcoin monetizes into a $10 trillion+ asset, demand for the network is orders of magnitude larger than today, and we’ve had a few more halvings,” they wrote.
Grayscale, the money manager behind the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC), remarked on the potentially dramatic change in outlook for miners in an emailed newsletter on Saturday.
“If transaction fees normalize at a level higher than in the past, the impact of the halving on miner revenue will be dampened,” Grayscale wrote.
:format(jpg)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/coindesk/M3CWRWOSM5ECHNY5EXRVGZTA4Q.png)
:format(jpg)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/coindesk/WLEFHRFC2FDPZA7S5DN5W5RUBM.png)
:format(jpg)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/coindesk/Z53L6V5CWFD35C7FAXSNOUFEFI.png)