Forums
Talk about anything you want!
Login to get your referral link.
breaking: ethereum vs. solana war ends quietly 🤯 ethereum’s l2 rollups vs. solana’s immediate finality – which side
The Ethereum-Solana narrative culminates in nuanced architectural considerations: Ethereum’s L2 rollups emphasize gradual finality, contrasting Solana’s immediate
The Ethereum-Solana debate in 2025 focuses on architectural differences. Ethereum emphasizes modular rollups on Layer 2, while Solana prioritizes monolithic throughput. In practical use, Ethereum’s L2 rollups provide “soft” finality upon transaction acceptance, with full economic finality once the state root is on L1. Solana offers immediate finality within a 400-millisecond window. The choice between the two depends on application needs, cost, and desired user experience.
Solana’s efficient setup streamlines congestion handling with minimal fees. Ethereum’s approach includes various upgrades like Pectra and Fusaka to enhance data availability and resistance to censorship. Solana excels in high-frequency trading, while Ethereum’s L2 works well for games and social apps. Developers appreciate Solana’s simplicity and shared state, while Ethereum offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness. The best choice depends on the specific application requirements.
How the Ethereum vs. Solana war ended quietly, not with a bang but with a whimper
3
Voices
2
Replies